Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?

If  best 5g emf protection 've ever wandered through a town you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body areas. This can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds


If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further your location from the tower.

While it sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that those living close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those living further distance from them.

However, this study also revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ in the human body and is responsible for protecting other organs.
best 5g emf protection for home  for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence.  best emf cell phone protection  include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effects on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.

In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.